|
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are hypothetical but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees. There's a question I hear some version of almost every month. A public employee in their late 50s, usually with 25-30 years of service, tells me they want to retire early. Then they pause and add, "But I still owe $40,000 on my mortgage. Should I just keep working until it's paid off?" The specifics change. Sometimes it's a teacher. Sometimes it's a firefighter. The loan balance might be $30,000 or $80,000. But the core question is always the same. And the person asking always looks exhausted. Here's what strikes me about these conversations. These folks typically have saved very well between their DCP accounts and personal investments. Their pensions will cover most of their basic expenses. But that remaining debt feels like an anchor keeping them from the retirement they've been planning for decades. I see this pattern constantly with Washington State public employees in their final working years. The debt question becomes this massive psychological barrier, even when the numbers tell a different story. The Real Cost of Staying Longer Let's talk about what "just working a few more years" actually means. Those aren't abstract years. They're specific mornings, actual weekends, real family moments. They're the years when your body still wants to be active. When your parents might still be around. When retirement doesn't just mean resting, it means living. But here's the thing I've learned working with public employees. The debt conversation is almost never really about the math. It's about safety. It's about not wanting to mess up after decades of doing everything right. What the Numbers Actually Show Your DRS pension has a specific structure¹. Your benefit is based on your average compensation and years of service. Working extra years to pay off debt might increase your pension slightly, but you need to run the actual calculation. Oftentimes, the math isn’t the problem. The feeling of carrying debt into retirement is the problem. When Debt Actually Matters I'm not going to tell you that debt never matters. That would be ridiculous. Here's what I look at when a client brings up debt in their final working years. The interest rate matters more than the balance. A $30,000 car loan at 7% interest is very different than a $200,000 mortgage at 3.5%. One is actively draining your resources. The other is barely keeping pace with inflation. The payment matters more than the total. Can your projected retirement income (pension plus Social Security plus portfolio withdrawals) comfortably cover your monthly obligations? That's the question. Not whether you could theoretically pay everything off before you retire. The Strategy Here's what I've seen work for Washington State employees who want to retire early but have debt. Compare the guaranteed return. Paying off a 7% car loan is like earning a guaranteed 7% return on that money. That's actually pretty good. Paying off a 3.5% mortgage when your investment accounts might earn 7-8% annually? The math favors keeping the mortgage. But here's where it gets personal. Some people sleep better with no mortgage payment, even if it's not the optimal financial move. That's a legitimate consideration. Consider the PEBB healthcare bridge. If you retire before 65, you can continue PEBB coverage2. But you'll be paying the full premium out of pocket. That's another monthly obligation to factor in alongside your debt payments. Don't forget to include it in your retirement budget. Think about Social Security timing. Most Washington public employees can claim Social Security benefits in addition to their pension. If you retire at 58 but wait until 67 to claim Social Security, you have a nine-year gap to plan for. The Question You Should Actually Be Asking Not "Should I pay off my debt before I retire?" The better question is "Can I afford my debt payments in retirement?" If the answer is yes, and if keeping that debt allows you to retire years earlier than you would otherwise, then the debt isn't your enemy. It's just a monthly expense like any other. If the answer is no, then you need a different plan. Maybe that's working longer. Maybe that's refinancing. Maybe that's downsizing to a smaller house. But at least you're solving the actual problem instead of just feeling anxious about debt in the abstract. I think about the public employees I've worked with who've faced this question. The ones who ran their numbers, made a plan, and decided to retire with manageable debt often tell me later how relieved they are that they didn't wait. They talk about finally having time for the things they'd been putting off. Backpacking trips they'd been planning for years. More time with aging parents. Volunteering for causes they care about. That's what this is really about. The debt is just numbers on paper. Your life is the thing that's actually happening. Sources 1. Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. "PERS Plan 2 Member Handbook." https://www.drs.wa.gov/plan/pers2/ 2. Washington State Health Care Authority. "PEBB Continuation Coverage." https://www.hca.wa.gov/employee-retiree-benefits/retirees -Seth Deal
0 Comments
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are hypothetical but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees.
I think about this question a lot when I'm working with clients on their retirement plans. We spend hours running numbers. Pension options. Tax projections. Healthcare costs. Investment allocation. And then, usually near the end of our meetings, someone will say something like: "I guess I'll finally have time to relax." And I wonder: is that really what they want to do for the next 30 years? Because from what I've seen, the people who retire early and are genuinely happy six months later, a year later, five years later... they're not the ones who are just relaxing. They're the ones who figured out what they were retiring TO, not just what they were retiring FROM. The Question Nobody Asks During Retirement Planning Everyone focuses on the money part. Can I afford to retire? What pension option should I take? How do I bridge healthcare to Medicare? When should I claim Social Security? Those are important questions. I spend most of my time helping people answer them. But there's another question that matters just as much, and almost nobody asks it during the planning phase. What am I actually going to DO? Not in the first month. Not during that honeymoon period where you're catching up on house projects and taking that trip you've been putting off. I mean three years in. Five years in. What fills your days when you're 62 and healthy and have potentially 30 more years ahead of you? The Reality of 10,000 Empty Days Let's do some math. If you retire at 58 and live to 88, that's 30 years. 30 years times 365 days equals 10,950 days. Before you retired, your job filled about 2,000 hours per year. Work days, meetings, projects, deadlines, colleague interactions. Now you have 2,000 hours to fill. Every single year. For potentially three decades. That's a lot of golf. I'm being a little flippant, but the point is serious. The transition from a structured work life to completely unstructured time is harder than most people expect. And the financial planning industry doesn't talk about it much because we're focused on making sure you don't run out of money. What Actually Works (Based on What I've Seen) Here's what I've noticed from clients who are thriving in retirement versus those who are struggling. The ones who are happy didn't just plan their finances. They planned their time. They started before they retired. I've seen people who spent their last years before retirement gradually building up volunteer work. One example: someone who started with a literacy program while still working full-time. By the time they left their job, they had a ready-made structure waiting. Three mornings a week. Relationships already established. A place where they felt needed. It wasn't about filling time. It was about creating purpose on their own terms. They have multiple things, not one big thing. The people who struggle are often the ones who put all their identity eggs in one basket. "I'm going to travel full time." (Gets expensive and exhausting.) "I'm going to start a business." (Sounds great until you realize you just gave yourself another job.) "I'm going to finally relax." (Turns out humans aren't wired for endless relaxation.) The ones who are content have a portfolio of activities. Volunteer work two days a week. Hiking group on Thursdays. Grandkids on Tuesdays. Book club once a month. Part-time consulting gig that brings in a little money and keeps their brain engaged. None of it is overwhelming. All of it adds up to a life. They kept some structure. This surprised me at first, but it makes sense. After spending 30 years with structure, going completely unstructured feels untethered for a lot of people. The happiest retirees I know have routines. Not rigid schedules, but patterns. Coffee and reading in the morning. Walk after lunch. Volunteer work on specific days. Dinner with friends every other Friday. Structure by choice feels different than structure by obligation. They found ways to still contribute. This one's big. Humans need to feel useful. We're wired for it. The DRS pension provides financial security. But it doesn't provide the feeling of being needed that work often gave you (even when you didn't always love your job). One LEOFF 2 member I worked with retired from the fire department at 53. Thought he'd love having nothing to do. Hated it. Started teaching fire science classes at the community college two days a week. Not for the money (though it doesn't hurt). For the feeling of passing on what he knows. Now he's actually happy. The Part-Time Work Consideration Speaking of contributing, let's talk about working after retirement. A lot of early retirees end up going back to some kind of work. Not because they need the money, but because they miss parts of work they didn't expect to miss. If you're a WA public employee with a pension, you can work up to 867 hours per year in a DRS-covered position (about 17 hours per week) without affecting your pension. That's enough for meaningful part-time work. There are no hour limitations on private sector work or other non-DRS-covered jobs. Some people do consulting in their former field. Some get completely different jobs they always wanted to try. Some volunteer in ways that feel like work but without the paycheck. The key is that it's optional. You're working because you want to, not because you have to. That changes everything. What This Means for Your Planning I think about retirement planning in two phases now. Phase one: Make sure you can afford it. Pension strategy, investment management, tax planning, healthcare bridge to Medicare. All the financial stuff. Phase two: Make sure you'll actually enjoy it. Most people spend 90% of their energy on phase one and barely think about phase two until they're already retired. That's backwards. The financial part is important. But what's the point of being financially secure if you're going to be miserable? Some Questions Worth Asking Now If you're planning to retire in the next few years, try asking yourself these: What did I actually like about my job? (Not the paycheck. The actual work.) What have I always wanted to try but didn't have time for? Who do I want to spend more time with? What makes me feel useful? What would a good Tuesday look like if I didn't have to work? These aren't easy questions. But they're worth thinking about before you turn in your retirement paperwork. Here's What I'd Suggest Start experimenting now. You don't have to wait until you retire to figure out what you want your retirement to look like. Take some vacation days and live like you're retired. Not a special trip. A regular week at home with nothing scheduled. See what you do. See how it feels. Join something now that you could continue after retirement. A volunteer organization, a hiking group, a community college class. Test drive the life before you commit to it permanently. And think hard about what you're retiring TO, not just what you're retiring FROM. The financial planning will make sure you can afford retirement. But only you can make sure retirement is actually worth having. Sources
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are hypothetical but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington public employees.
I get this question all the time from clients approaching retirement. They're in their mid-to-late 50s. The pension numbers work. They're financially ready. But they're not sure they want to stop working completely. Maybe they love what they do and just want to dial it back. Maybe they want to stay connected to their profession. Maybe they're worried about losing structure and purpose. So they ask: Can I retire and then go back to work part-time? The answer isn't just "yes" or "no." It's more complicated than that. And the wrong move could cost thousands of dollars in pension benefits. The 867-Hour Rule You Need to Know Here's what most Washington public employees don't realize about working after retirement. If you retire from a DRS pension and then return to work for any DRS-covered employer (schools, state agencies, cities, counties), there's a strict limit. You can only work 867 hours per calendar year without affecting your pension.¹ That's roughly 16 hours per week for a full year. Go over that limit by even one hour, and your entire pension stops. Not reduced. Stopped.¹ It doesn't restart until you either separate from that employer or January 1 of the next year, whichever comes first.¹ The rule gets more complicated depending on your specific situation. Some retirees can work up to 1,040 hours under temporary legislation that runs through January 1, 2030.¹ For school districts, qualifying PERS, SERS, and TRS retirees can work in non-administrative positions.¹ The term non-administrative means positions that do not require an administrative certification (like Principal, Vice Principal, Program Administrator, Superintendent) and do not evaluate staff.¹ And there's another requirement that catches people off guard. You must wait at least 30 consecutive days after your retirement date before returning to work for any DRS employer.² You also cannot have any pre-arranged agreement (written or verbal) to return to work before you retire.² When Part-Time Work Makes Sense From what I've seen working with Washington public employees, part-time work after retirement makes sense in a few specific situations. First, when you want to stay engaged but need more flexibility. Teaching two classes instead of five. Working school hours instead of administrative hours. Doing the parts of your job you love without the parts that drain you. Second, when you have specialized knowledge that's hard to replace. School districts especially struggle to fill certain positions. If you have expertise they need, working part-time can be mutually beneficial. Third, when you're testing retirement before fully committing. Some people retire, try it for a few months, and realize they miss the structure and social connection. Working part-time can ease that transition. But here's what I always ask clients to consider: Is the financial benefit worth the restrictions? Because once you're subject to that 867-hour limit, you have to track every single hour carefully. Paid holidays count. Compensatory time counts. Sick leave and annual leave taken in place of normal work hours count.¹ Miss the mark and you lose months of pension payments. The Private Sector Alternative Now if you work for a non-DRS employer after retirement, none of these restrictions apply. Your pension continues. No hour limits. No waiting periods.¹ The coffee shop down the street? That's not a DRS employer. Your pension keeps coming. A private consulting firm? Not a DRS employer. Your pension keeps coming. Even working for a different state's government or federal government? Not a DRS employer in Washington's system. Your pension keeps coming. This is the path many retirees take when they want to work but don't want to deal with DRS restrictions. I've worked with clients who retired from state agencies and then started consulting for private firms. They make more per hour than they did as state employees, work on projects they choose, and their pension never stops. What About Social Security? This is where it gets even more interesting. Because if you're collecting Social Security before your full retirement age and you work, there's a completely different set of rules. For 2026, if you're under full retirement age for the entire year and earn more than $24,480, Social Security reduces your benefit by $1 for every $2 you earn above that limit.³ In the year you reach full retirement age, the limit jumps to $65,160, and the reduction is only $1 for every $3 you earn above the limit.³ This only applies to earnings before the month you reach full retirement age.³ Once you reach full retirement age, you can earn as much as you want with no reduction to your Social Security benefit.³ So if you're planning to work part-time and you're collecting both a DRS pension and Social Security before full retirement age, you need to think about both sets of rules. The Tax Consideration Here's something else to think about. When you combine a pension, Social Security, and part-time work income, you might push yourself into a higher tax bracket. Let's say your PERS 2 pension is $3,500 per month. That's $42,000 per year. Add Social Security of $2,000 per month. That's another $24,000. You're already at $66,000 of taxable income. Now add part-time earnings of $20,000 from working under the 867-hour limit. You're at $86,000. And depending on your filing status and other factors, that could mean a higher marginal tax rate than you expected in retirement. I'm not saying don't do it. I'm saying run the numbers first. Because sometimes the after-tax benefit of that part-time income is less attractive than it appears on paper. What This Means for You If you're thinking about working part-time after retirement, start by asking yourself why. Is it purely financial? Is it about staying engaged? Is it because you're not sure you're ready to fully retire? The answer to that question changes everything. If it's financial, run the numbers carefully. Factor in taxes, lost leisure time, and the hassle of tracking hours if you're going back to a DRS employer. If it's about staying engaged, consider whether private sector work or consulting might give you more flexibility without the restrictions. If you're not ready to fully retire, be honest with yourself about that. There's no shame in working longer before pulling the retirement trigger. The worst move you can make is to retire, go back to a DRS employer without fully understanding the rules, exceed 867 hours, and lose months of pension payments you were counting on. That happens more often than you'd think. Sources
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are hypothetical but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees. This article provides general information about estate planning documents and is not legal advice. For specific guidance on your situation, consult with a qualified estate planning attorney.
Picture this scenario. A husband suffers a massive stroke. He's a PERS 2 member with 28 years of service at the city. Not retired yet. Still working. Now he's in intensive care, unable to speak or make decisions. And his wife has a problem. She needs to access their retirement accounts to pay medical bills. But she can't. No power of attorney. No joint ownership on the DCP account. Nothing. She could eventually apply for disability retirement on his behalf through DRS¹. But first she'd likely need to petition the court for guardianship to get the legal authority. In the meantime, she's stuck. This is what happens to your money if you become incapacitated without the right documents in place. Your DRS Pension Requires Legal Authority DRS has a disability retirement process². But someone must apply on your behalf with legal authority to act for you. Typically, your spouse would need either a power of attorney you set up beforehand, or court-appointed guardianship³. The court process can take weeks or months with legal fees, court costs, and medical evaluations. Your DCP Account Is Frozen Without a Power of Attorney Your DCP account is in your name only⁴. If you haven't granted your spouse authority over retirement accounts in a durable power of attorney, they cannot access it. Not to withdraw. Not to change investments. Not even to check the balance. The account sits there. Your Bank Accounts Might Not Be Accessible Either Joint accounts usually remain accessible⁵, but banks may freeze them once aware of incapacity. Individual accounts, old 401(k)s, IRAs, brokerage accounts? All frozen without a power of attorney. The Documents That Actually Matter Two documents can prevent this. First, a durable power of attorney for financial matters⁶. This document names someone to manage your financial affairs if you become incapacitated. It typically covers bank accounts, retirement accounts, real estate, bills, taxes, and other financial matters. "Durable" means it stays in effect during incapacity. There are two common types: an immediate durable power of attorney (effective when signed) or a springing power of attorney (effective only when a doctor certifies incapacity)⁶. Many estate planning attorneys recommend immediate durable because springing powers can create delays. Second, a healthcare power of attorney⁷. This document names someone to make medical decisions for you. It's separate from the financial power of attorney because healthcare and financial decisions are governed by different laws. Most comprehensive estate plans include both documents. What Actually Happens Without These Documents Without powers of attorney, your spouse typically can't access your accounts. The bank, DRS, and your DCP provider will likely say the same thing: "We need legal authority." The solution? Petition the court for guardianship⁸. The process takes weeks to months with hearings, medical evaluations, and legal fees. Much of that process could be avoided with proper estate planning documents. The Power of Attorney You Actually Need From what I've seen working with clients, a durable power of attorney typically needs to explicitly grant authority to handle retirement accounts (DRS, DCP, IRAs, 401(k)s), access bank accounts, make tax decisions, manage real estate, and handle insurance policies⁹. Some powers of attorney are too vague, and financial institutions may want to see explicit language granting authority over retirement accounts. An estate planning attorney who understands Washington State law can help ensure your documents will be accepted by financial institutions. What to Do Next You're in your 50s. You're healthy. This isn't fun to think about. But in my experience, the people who end up in crisis are often the ones who assumed they had more time. The people who have peace of mind are typically those who addressed these issues when they didn't need to. If you don't have these documents, consider talking to an estate planning attorney in Washington State. Once you're incapacitated, it's too late to set these up. If you have documents older than five years, it may be worth reviewing them with an attorney. Laws change. Your situation changes. Your DRS pension and DCP account represent decades of work. Proper estate planning can help ensure they're accessible when needed. Sources
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are hypothetical but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees.
The Question That Stops Most Retirees I was reviewing a retirement plan last month when my client said something that caught me off guard. "I'm paying almost $400 a month for life insurance. My advisor told me I'd need it forever." He's 58, a city employee with 26 years of service, planning to retire next year. His kids are in their 30s and independent. His house is paid off. And he's still writing that check every month. What I've Learned Working With Retirees Most people think about life insurance the wrong way once they retire. They think the question is "Do I still need life insurance?" But that's not actually the question. The real question is: "What am I protecting against?" When you're working and raising kids, the answer is clear. You're protecting your family's income. Your mortgage payment. College expenses. The life you're building together. But in retirement? The entire picture changes. The Problem with His Policy His $400 monthly premium was for a universal life policy he'd bought 15 years ago. The death benefit was $500,000. We walked through what would happen if he passed away tomorrow. His wife would receive his survivor pension benefit from PERS 2¹. She could receive Social Security survivor benefits based on his earnings record, though she'd get the higher of either her own benefit or his survivor benefit, not both². Their house was paid off. Their kids were independent. She'd actually be fine financially. The $500,000 death benefit would just be extra money sitting in an account. Money that cost him $4,800 every single year to maintain. How Washington State Employee Benefits Change the Calculation Here's what most public employees don't realize about their retirement benefits. Your DRS pension includes survivor benefit options¹. When you retire, you can choose to have a portion or all of your pension continue for your spouse after you die. This is built into your benefit structure. Social Security also provides survivor benefits². Your surviving spouse can receive a benefit based on your earnings record. However, they receive the higher of either their own benefit or the survivor benefit, not both. These two income sources often cover most or all of your spouse's essential expenses in retirement. This is fundamentally different from private sector employees who rely primarily on 401(k) savings. Washington State public employees have guaranteed income sources that can continue after death. Three Situations Where You Might Still Need Life Insurance Life insurance in retirement isn't always unnecessary. Here are three situations where I consider it: You Have a Survivor Benefit Gap This is the big one. If you chose the single life pension option for maximum monthly income, your pension stops completely when you die¹. Zero. Nothing. Gone. Your spouse would be left relying entirely on Social Security and investment accounts. This is an enormous financial risk if your spouse depends on that pension income. Life insurance can bridge this gap during your early retirement years, providing income replacement until your investment accounts can sustain withdrawals or your spouse reaches full Social Security retirement age. You Have Dependent Children or Special Needs Dependents If you have minor children or adult children with special needs who depend on your income, life insurance provides essential protection. The Social Security survivor benefit for children generally continues until age 18³. For special needs dependents, permanent life insurance might be appropriate as part of a comprehensive plan. You Want to Leave a Specific Legacy Some people want to leave money to children, grandchildren, or charities. If your retirement accounts and other assets don't provide the legacy you want, life insurance can fill that role. But here's the key question: Is that legacy worth the annual premium cost? What He Decided to Do We ran the numbers together. With his 100% joint survivor option, his wife would receive a continuing pension after his death¹. The exact percentage depends on which survivor option he selects at retirement. She'd also have Social Security, receiving the higher of either her own benefit or his survivor benefit². Plus access to their $650,000 in savings. Her income would drop, but their expenses would drop too. One person eats less. Travel costs less. Healthcare through PEBB would continue. She'd be comfortable. He cancelled the policy after our analysis. That freed up $4,800 per year he could actually use now. How to Think About This for Yourself Here's the framework I use with clients: Add up your spouse's guaranteed income if you died tomorrow. Include survivor pension benefits and Social Security survivor benefits (remember, they get the higher of the two benefits, not both). Compare that to their estimated expenses. One person typically spends less of what a couple spends. If there's a significant gap, calculate how much insurance fills it. Then get term insurance quotes. If there's no gap or your investment accounts can cover it, you probably don't need life insurance. The Cost of Keeping the Wrong Policy Life insurance in your 50s and 60s gets expensive. That's money you could use now. Traveling. Helping your kids. Building your investment accounts. What About Final Expenses? Final expenses can be very expensive….but how expensive? If you have been a diligent saver, you can likely cover these expenses with your savings. But you don't need $500,000 of coverage for final expenses. Here's What to Do This Month Pull out your life insurance policies. All of them. Look at the death benefit amounts and the premiums you're paying. Then calculate what your spouse would actually receive from your DRS pension survivor benefit¹, Social Security survivor benefits² (the higher of the two), and retirement accounts. Ask yourself: Is this insurance still protecting against a real financial risk? Or is it just a habit from when your situation was different? If you're not sure, that's exactly the kind of analysis I help clients work through. Your retirement is about living well now while being smart about the future, not paying for protection you no longer need. Sources
Note: The examples and case studies in this article are fictional but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees. I opened an email recently that stopped me mid-sip of coffee. A client had just finished updating her will after her remarriage. Everything carefully reorganized, her new husband properly included, estate attorney fees paid. She felt relieved. Done. Then she logged into her DRS account and saw it. Her ex-husband's name. Still listed as the beneficiary on her PERS pension. From a form she'd filled out fifteen years ago when she first started with the state. The will she'd just spent money updating? Wouldn't cover this. What most people misunderstand about beneficiary forms Here's what catches people off guard. Your will is important. It controls a lot. But beneficiary designations work differently. Think about what that means for Washington State public employees. You have a DRS pension account. You have a DCP (457b) account. Maybe life insurance through work. Each one has its own beneficiary form. If you're married and name someone other than your spouse as your beneficiary, retirement system laws may require DRS to pay your spouse anyway¹. Washington is a community property state with specific rules that vary by plan. The beneficiary designation you filled out when you were hired? That's what DRS follows. Not what your will says. Not what you told your family. Not what you intended. The form. Why Washington public employees face unique complications I sit across from state and city employees regularly. What I've noticed is this: they have more accounts with beneficiary designations than they realize. PERS/LEOFF/other pension contributions. DCP accounts. PEBB life insurance. Sometimes additional voluntary life insurance. Your DCP beneficiaries must be declared separately from any beneficiaries you may have selected for another plan or program, like a pension². Each account. Separate form. Separate designation. One client I worked with had updated her will after her divorce. Removed her ex completely. But she'd forgotten about three separate beneficiary forms: her pension, her DCP, and her supplemental life insurance. The will was perfect. The beneficiary forms? Still listed her ex-husband. The specific times you need to check these forms Most estate planning guidance suggests reviewing your estate plan regularly. But certain life events demand immediate attention. Marriage or remarriage If you marry in retirement, you have a one-time option to add your spouse as a survivor between your first and second year of marriage¹. Miss that window and it's permanent. Before retirement? You can update anytime. But you have to actually do it. Divorce or separation Beneficiary designations don't automatically update. If you marry, divorce or have another significant change in your life, be sure to update your beneficiary designation because these life events might invalidate your previous choices³. Birth or adoption of children New parents are exhausted. I get it. I have two young kids myself. But this matters. Especially for public employees with guaranteed pension benefits that could provide for children if something happens. Death of your named beneficiary If your survivor dies before you do, you can contact DRS to remove the survivor and increase your monthly benefit payments back to the single amount¹. The same principle applies to beneficiaries who haven't been designated as survivors but were listed to receive remaining contributions. What actually happens with your retirement accounts Let me walk through how this works for Washington State public employees. If a member passes before separating from their Washington public service position, their contribution balance plus interest will be paid out to their beneficiaries³. But here's where it gets specific. If you don't submit beneficiary information, any benefits due will be paid to your surviving spouse or minor child. If you don't have a surviving spouse or minor child, DRS will pay your estate¹. That sounds like a safety net. And it is. But "estate" means probate. Delay. Legal fees. Court oversight.[GU1] Potentially bad tax result. Once you retire, the rules shift. If you select a survivor benefit option, within 90 days of receiving your first retirement payment, you can change your survivor selection. After 90 days, your survivor selection is permanent unless your survivor dies, you marry in retirement, or you want to remove a survivor who is not your spouse or registered domestic partner¹. That 90-day window matters enormously. How to get this right The process isn't complicated. It just requires attention. Start with an inventory List every account that has a beneficiary designation. For Washington public employees, that typically includes DRS pension contributions, DCP (457b) accounts, PEBB life insurance, any supplemental life insurance through work, and personal IRAs or 401(k)s from previous employers. Check each designation You can update your beneficiary designation at any time by logging into your online DRS account³. The website is straightforward. Takes maybe ten minutes. For DCP accounts specifically, you can update your beneficiaries online through drs.wa.gov or complete the paper form and mail it to DRS². Coordinate with your will Your beneficiary designations and your will should tell the same story. Not contradict each other. If your will leaves everything to your spouse but your DCP lists your adult children, that creates confusion and potentially conflict for your family. What to do this week Not someday. This week. Log into your DRS account. Review your current beneficiary designations. If you're married, make sure your spouse is properly listed (or that you both agree on a different arrangement with proper documentation). Check your DCP account separately. Remember, it's a different designation than your pension. If you have a will, pull it out. Compare what it says to what your beneficiary forms say. Look for conflicts. If you find outdated information, update it immediately. The online process takes minutes. This isn't exciting work. I know that. But it's the kind of detail that protects your family when it matters most. Sources
-Seth DealNote: The examples and case studies in this article are fictional but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees.
The Conversation That Changed How I Think About ThisI was sitting across from a prospective client recently when she said something that made me pause. "I know I need to do this power of attorney thing, but I have no idea who to pick." Jennifer is 55, works for a county, has 24 years of service. Smart, organized, planning to retire in her late 50s. But this decision had her completely stuck. Her mom lives in Florida. Her only sibling has filed for bankruptcy twice. Her adult kids are just starting their careers. No obvious answer. Then she told me about Mark. What Happened to MarkMark was Jennifer's colleague. He had a stroke at 52. His family discovered he'd named his brother as his power of attorney agent. The same brother who had filed for bankruptcy and was currently unemployed. While Mark recovered, his family watched his brother struggle with DRS benefits and delay critical benefit decisions. Picking someone you trust isn't enough. You need someone who can handle Washington State employee benefits during a crisis. Why This Is Different for WA Public EmployeesMost power of attorney advice treats everyone the same. It misses the unique considerations that come with DRS pensions, deferred compensation accounts, and PEBB coverage. Your power of attorney agent needs to understand complex pension survivor benefit elections and make decisions that could affect decades of retirement planning¹. Unlike private sector employees with straightforward 401(k) accounts, your agent may need to navigate DRS regulations and pension benefit timing decisions. The person you choose affects not just your immediate care, but your family's long-term financial security. The 4 Questions That Actually MatterQuestion 1: Can They Actually Be Available When It Counts?Washington law doesn't require your agent to live in-state², but let me tell you what I've seen happen. Your agent may need to coordinate with PEBB representatives during business hours. They might need to communicate with your HR department about time-sensitive benefit decisions. Can they do this from across the country? Maybe. But it's harder than you think. Jennifer's mother in Florida loves her deeply and knows her values. But managing Washington State benefits from three time zones away during an emergency? That's a different conversation. She needed someone who could respond during Pacific Time business hours for time-sensitive benefit decisions. Question 2: Do They Understand Money (Really)?Good intentions don't manage retirement accounts. Your agent needs to understand and manage complex financial matters. Here's what they'll need to handle: · DRS beneficiary designations and survivor benefit elections · Deferred compensation distributions coordination · PEBB coverage decisions and COBRA timing · Detailed record-keeping as required by law³ Jennifer's sister has a good heart but has never managed investments or dealt with government benefits. Her oldest daughter works in finance and has already helped Jennifer understand her 457(b) options. Financial competence proved more important than age or family relationship. Question 3: Can They Handle a Crisis Without Falling Apart?Power of attorney situations happen during medical emergencies when emotions run high. Decisions about pension benefits and health coverage can't wait for family consensus. Your agent needs the emotional strength to make difficult decisions quickly while managing family dynamics. During Mark's crisis, his brother became overwhelmed by family pressure. He delayed critical decisions about Mark's PERS benefits because he couldn't handle the stress and the family disagreements. Jennifer realized she needed someone who could remain calm and decisive during emotional situations while dealing with the added complexity of state benefit systems. Question 4: Do They Actually Understand What You Care About?Your agent will be making decisions that reflect your priorities and life goals. Especially regarding your retirement benefits and your family's financial future. Decisions about pension survivor benefits, deferred compensation timing, and PEBB coverage can have permanent consequences for your spouse and family. Jennifer's daughter not only understood her financial goals but had witnessed Jennifer's dedication to her state career. She understood the importance of preserving the retirement benefits Jennifer had worked decades to earn. How Jennifer Made Her DecisionBefore she applied these four questions, Jennifer was stuck. Paralyzed. Worried about hurt feelings. After working through the criteria, she made clear decisions. She named her financially competent daughter as primary agent. Selected her responsible younger brother (who lives locally) as alternate. Included specific language about DRS and PEBB benefit coordination. She had frank conversations with family members about her reasoning. Now Jennifer knows that if something happens, someone capable will manage her state employee benefits effectively. Her family supports her choice because she explained her reasoning clearly. What You Should Do NextStart with an honest assessment of potential agents against all four criteria. Have conversations about their willingness to serve. Review your Washington State benefits that would need management. Discuss your values with your chosen agent. Explain the basics of your DRS benefits. Provide contact information for DRS customer service and your HR department1. Work with an attorney to draft documents that meet Washington State requirements. And communicate your choice to family members. Explain your decision. Focus on the practical reasons rather than personal preferences. The Bottom LineThe question isn't just who you trust most. It's who can best protect the retirement security you've spent your career building. The best power of attorney agent is someone who combines trustworthiness with competence, availability with understanding, and emotional stability with respect for your values. For Washington State public employees, this means finding someone who can navigate both family dynamics and the complexities of state employee benefits. Don't let uncertainty delay this critical decision. Your family's financial security may depend on the choice you make today. Sources1. Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. "Power of Attorney." https://www.drs.wa.gov/sitemap/poa/ 2. Washington State Courts. "RCW 11.125.050: Power of attorney—Requirements." https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.125.050 3. End of Life Washington. "Durable Power of Attorney." https://endoflifewa.org/tools-for-planning/durable-power-of-attorney/ Note: The examples and case studies in this article are fictional but represent real situations I have encountered in my practice working with Washington State public employees. The Discovery That Changed EverythingI was on a Zoom call with a new client when she said something that made me pause. "I'm pretty sure my ex-husband is still listed as beneficiary on my TRS account," Sarah said. "We divorced seven years ago." She'd remarried four years ago. Her current husband was on the Zoom call with her. Sarah is a 58-year-old teacher with 28 years of service. She figured her basic will covered everything. It didn't. What Sarah WitnessedHer colleague David had passed away unexpectedly the previous year. What Sarah witnessed during his family's 18-month struggle through probate court opened her eyes. The complications. The delays. The costs. The stress on top of grief. Proper estate planning documents could have prevented all of it. The Problem Most Public Employees MissMost estate planning advice treats Washington State employees like any other client. That approach misses something critical. You have unique pension benefits through DRS that have specific survivor rules and beneficiary requirements1. Your pension works differently than typical 401(k) accounts. The generic estate planning template doesn't account for any of this. And beneficiary designations on your DRS accounts override your will entirely1. The Five Documents That Actually MatterWashington State employees need five core estate planning documents that coordinate with your specific benefits. Document 1: A Washington State-Specific WillYour will names guardians for minor children and ensures property not covered by beneficiary designations gets distributed according to your wishes2. But Washington's community property laws and intestacy statutes have specific requirements2. A will drafted in another state or using generic online forms may not address Washington's unique legal landscape. Document 2: Durable Power of Attorney for FinancesThis document authorizes someone you trust to handle your financial affairs if you become incapacitated3. Think about it: You're 58, planning to retire at 60. You have a stroke. Your spouse needs access to your pension information, deferred compensation, and PEBB benefits. Without proper power of attorney? Your family may need to go to court for conservatorship³ to gain legal authority to manage DRS accounts. Document 3: Healthcare Directive and Medical Power of AttorneyIn Washington State, you can create advance directives that include both a healthcare directive (living will) and medical power of attorney⁴. These documents work together to ensure your medical wishes are followed if you become incapacitated. Your healthcare directive should address how medical decisions interact with your PEBB coverage, especially if you're considering early retirement with COBRA continuation. David's family faced difficult decisions about experimental treatments without clear guidance. They argued. They second-guessed. Nobody knew what David would have wanted. Document 4: Beneficiary Designations Review and UpdatesThis is where most Washington State employees make critical mistakes. Your DRS pension, deferred compensation, and PEBB life insurance transfer directly to named beneficiaries5. They completely bypass probate. They override your will. Many employees haven't reviewed their beneficiary designations in years. Life changes like marriage, divorce, births, or deaths can make existing designations outdated5. Sarah's ex-husband from her 2018 divorce was still listed as primary beneficiary. Her deferred compensation had no contingent beneficiary listed at all. We spent the next hour updating everything. You can review and update your beneficiaries through your DRS online account5. Document 5: Trust Documents (When Your Family Needs Them)Most Washington State employees won't hit the estate tax threshold. But trusts make sense for specific situations: minor children requiring asset protection, blended family situations, or beneficiaries who need financial guidance. Sarah explored whether a trust might help ensure her TRS benefits are distributed according to her wishes if both she and her husband pass away while the children are young. Sarah's TransformationBefore: Basic 2015 will, no power of attorney, outdated beneficiary designations, no healthcare directive. After: Updated Washington-specific will, durable power of attorney for DRS and PEBB assets, combined healthcare directive, corrected beneficiary designations across all accounts. The result: Sarah now knows her family won't face what David's family encountered. What to Do NextStart with a document review. Locate all current estate documents. Access your DRS online account to review beneficiaries. List all your benefits: pension accounts, deferred compensation, PEBB life insurance. Schedule a consultation with an estate planning attorney experienced with Washington State employee benefits. Not just any attorney. One who understands how DRS accounts work and community property rules. Set calendar reminders for regular beneficiary reviews. Every four years minimum, or after any major life event. The Bottom LineUnlike retirement planning, where you have years to course-correct, estate planning failures only become apparent when it's too late to fix them. Your decades of public service have earned you valuable retirement benefits. These benefits deserve estate planning that addresses their unique characteristics. The question isn't whether you need these documents. The question is whether you'll create them before your family needs them. Sources1. Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. "Beneficiary information." https://www.drs.wa.gov/sitemap/beneficiary/ 2. Washington Law Help. "Powers of attorney and advance directives." https://www.washingtonlawhelp.org/topics/life-planning/powers-attorney-and-advance-directives 3. Washington State Courts. "Chapter 11.130 RCW: Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act." https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.130&full=true 4. End of Life Washington. "Advance Directives." https://endoflifewa.org/tools-for-planning/advance-directives/ 5. Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. "Online Account." https://www.drs.wa.gov/account/ -Seth DealCarol, a 63-year-old retired County Parks Department supervisor, followed the classic retirement advice: withdraw 4% of her portfolio every year, no matter what. When the market dropped significantly in her second year of retirement, she was forced to withdraw the same dollar amount from a much smaller portfolio—essentially selling low when she should have been reducing spending temporarily. When markets recovered strongly in year four, she stuck to her rigid 4% while watching her portfolio grow far beyond what she needed. If you're a Washington State employee approaching retirement, rigid withdrawal rules like the 4% approach often work against you. You need a dynamic strategy that adapts to market conditions while leveraging your unique pension advantages. Why Washington State Employees Have Unique Retirement Income AdvantagesHere's what I've learned helping Washington State employees transition to retirement: you have opportunities that most Americans don't have. Your guaranteed pension income provides a foundation that changes everything about retirement income planning. As a Financial Advisor working with Washington State public employees, I've seen how your pension benefits create strategic advantages. Most retirement advice assumes you're completely dependent on your portfolio for income. But Washington State employees have a three-legged retirement foundation: pension, Social Security, and personal savings. This foundation allows for completely different strategies than someone relying entirely on their 401(k) or investment accounts. Understanding how to coordinate these income sources can mean the difference between financial stress and financial confidence throughout a 20-30 year retirement. Your 4-Strategy PAYCHECK System for Sustainable Retirement IncomeStrategy #1: Your Pension Foundation StrategyYour pension typically provides the largest portion of your retirement income, but understanding exactly how it works is crucial for planning everything else. Critical Pension Decisions: Timing Optimization: Different retirement systems (PERS, TRS, etc.) have different optimal claiming strategies¹. Some allow for early retirement with reduced benefits, others require full service time for maximum benefits. This decision significantly impacts your lifetime income. Survivor Benefit Elections: You'll need to choose between higher monthly payments for your lifetime only, or reduced payments that continue for your spouse. This decision is irrevocable and significantly impacts your household's long-term security. Tax Planning Integration: Your pension is fully taxable as ordinary income. Understanding your pension amount helps plan withdrawal strategies from other accounts to manage your total tax burden. Inflation Considerations: Washington State pension systems include cost-of-living adjustments¹. This affects how much additional inflation protection you need from your investment portfolio. Foundation Calculation: Calculate your net pension income after taxes. This becomes your "baseline" that covers essential expenses. Everything above this comes from other sources, which fundamentally changes your risk tolerance for investment accounts. Strategy #2: The 5-Year Buffer Withdrawal SystemThis is the cornerstone of sustainable retirement income. Instead of random monthly withdrawals that force you to sell investments at unfavorable times, you create a systematic buffer. How the Buffer Works: Maintain 5 years of needed withdrawals from your investment accounts in high-quality short-duration bonds. You draw your monthly "paycheck" from this safe bucket while your growth investments remain untouched during down markets. Example Structure: If your pension covers $4,000/month and you need $6,500/month total, you'll withdraw $2,500/month from investments ($30,000/year). Your buffer should contain $150,000 in high quality short-term bonds. Strategic Replenishment: Annually review and replenish your buffer by strategically selling from your growth investments. This allows you to: · Choose when to sell (market timing flexibility) · Harvest tax losses when available · Rebalance while generating needed cash · Never be forced to sell during market downturns Strategy #3: Tax-Smart Withdrawal SequencingThe order in which you withdraw from different account types can impact your lifetime tax burden significantly. Most retirees approach this inefficiently and pay unnecessary taxes. Optimal Withdrawal Sequence: Phase 1: Early Retirement (62-65) If retiring before your pension starts: · Withdraw from taxable accounts first (likely lower capital gains tax rates) · Consider Roth conversions during low-income years · Delay pension and Social Security for higher benefits² Phase 2: Pension Bridge Years (65-70) When pension starts but before Social Security optimization: · Pension provides base income · Continue taxable account withdrawals · Strategic Roth conversions to fill lower tax brackets · Pull from traditional retirement accounts if needed Phase 3: Full Retirement (70+) Maximum Social Security, required distributions begin (73+): · Pension + Social Security provide substantial base · Required minimum distributions from traditional accounts³ · Use Roth accounts for large expenses and tax management · Maintain growth investments for later years Tax Coordination Benefits: · Smooth out tax brackets over multiple years · Reduce lifetime tax burden · Maximize after-tax spending power · Create flexibility for large expenses Strategy #4: Growth Investment CoordinationYour pension is equivalent to the "bond" portion of your retirement income, allowing your investment portfolio to focus on long-term growth and inflation protection. Rethinking Asset Allocation: Traditional retirement advice suggests becoming very conservative, but your pension changes this calculation. You may be able to maintain significant equity exposure because: · Pension provides guaranteed income stream · Investment portfolio supplements rather than replaces earnings · You have 20-30 years of retirement ahead · Inflation protection becomes crucial over long retirement Growth vs. Income Focus: Rather than chasing dividend-paying stocks or bond yields, focus on total return. Your buffer provides the income stability, allowing your growth investments to optimize for long-term returns rather than current income. Your Next Steps: Build Your Retirement Paycheck SystemIf you're a Washington State employee planning retirement: Foundation Assessment: 1. Calculate your exact pension benefit and timing options 2. Determine your Social Security optimization strategy 3. Assess your total retirement income needs Strategic Implementation: 1. Begin building your 5-year buffer before retirement 2. Plan your tax-efficient withdrawal sequence across account types 3. Coordinate your investment strategy with your pension foundation Creating a sustainable retirement paycheck for Washington State employees requires coordinating your unique pension advantages with dynamic withdrawal strategies and tax planning. The key is building a flexible system that provides security and growth while adapting to changing market conditions throughout your retirement years. Your pension foundation gives you strategic advantages that most Americans don't have—use them to create a retirement income system that can weather any financial storms and provide peace of mind for decades. Sources: ¹ Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. Retirement Benefits Overview. https://www.drs.wa.gov/ ² Social Security Administration. Retirement Benefits Planner. https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/ ³ Internal Revenue Service. Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions. https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-required-minimum-distributions-rmds -Seth DealDavid, a 54-year-old Sheriff's deputy, panicked when the market dropped and moved his entire $890,000 deferred compensation plan to "safe" money market funds. He planned to move back to stocks "when things settled down." Two years later, the market had recovered and reached new highs, but David was still sitting in cash earning virtually nothing. Fear had cost him significant growth during some of his most critical wealth-building years. If you're a Washington State employee in your 50s, the investment decisions you make this decade will largely determine whether you achieve financial freedom or struggle through retirement. Why Your 50s Are Your Make-or-Break Investment DecadeHere's what I've learned working with Washington State employees in their 50s: this decade is make-or-break for your retirement security. The investment mistakes you make now can't be easily recovered from, but the smart moves you make can set you up for financial freedom. As a Financial Advisor specializing in Washington State public employee retirement, I've observed that the 50s are when small mistakes become major problems. You have roughly 10-15 years or less until retirement, which means limited time to recover from major missteps. But here's your advantage: Washington State employees have pension benefits that provide a foundation most private sector workers lack¹. This changes which mistakes matter most and which risks you can afford to take. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for making smart decisions during this critical decade. The 5 Critical Investment Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Retirement SecurityMistake #1: Becoming Too Conservative Too Early (The Biggest Wealth Killer)This is the most expensive mistake I see. Employees in their 50s often dramatically reduce equity exposure, thinking they need to "protect" their money as they approach retirement. Why This Strategy Backfires: · You likely have 20-30 years of retirement ahead of you · Inflation will erode purchasing power over those decades · Your pension provides the "safe" foundation, allowing portfolio growth focus · Missing out on compound growth in your final working years is extremely costly The Reality Check: A healthy 60-year-old has a significant probability of living into their 80s or 90s². Your investment timeline isn't 10 years until retirement—it's 30+ years until your money stops working. The Strategic Alternative: Your pension acts as a large bond allocation in your overall financial picture. This may allow your investment portfolio to maintain meaningful equity exposure throughout your 50s and beyond. What I Tell Clients: Build your 5-year buffer of high quality, short duration bonds for retirement security, but keep your long-term money invested for long-term growth. The buffer provides the safety; your portfolio provides the purchasing power protection. Mistake #2: Making Emotional Decisions During Market VolatilityMarket volatility doesn't actually increase in your 50s—but it feels much scarier because the dollar amounts involved are larger and more consequential. Common Emotional Mistakes: · Selling after market declines (like David's costly mistake) · Chasing last year's best-performing funds · Making dramatic allocation changes based on news headlines · Abandoning your investment strategy during temporary downturns Why This Destroys Wealth: · Market timing rarely works, even for investment professionals · You're selling low and buying high—the opposite of wealth building · Transaction costs and taxes erode returns · You miss the best recovery days by being out of the market The Disciplined Solution: · Stick to your rebalancing strategy regardless of market conditions · Use market volatility as a rebalancing opportunity · Continue regular contributions during all market environments · Focus on time in the market, not timing the market Strategic Example: Instead of moving to cash during market stress, use the decline as an opportunity to rebalance from bonds into stocks at lower prices. Your systematic approach captures the "buy low" opportunity that emotional investors miss. Mistake #3: Neglecting Catch-Up Contributions (Leaving Money on the Table)This might be the most expensive oversight. In your 50s, you're eligible for catch-up contributions that can significantly boost your retirement wealth³. The 2025 Contribution Opportunities: · Regular DCP contribution limit: $23,500 · Catch-up contribution (age 50+): Additional $7,500 · Total possible: $31,000 annually³ · Final 3 Years contributions: $47,0004 The Wealth Impact: That extra $7,500 annually from age 50-65 equals $112,500 in additional contributions, plus all the growth on that money over 15+ years. Real-World Impact: An extra $7,500 annually growing at historical market rates could add substantial wealth to your retirement portfolio by age 65. Immediate Action Required: Review your current contribution rate. If you're not maximizing contributions including catch-ups, you're leaving substantial money on the table during your peak earning years. If you’re looking into the final 3 years contribution catch up, the rules are very nuanced so be sure to consult with a professional. Tax Benefits Bonus: These contributions also reduce your current taxable income if made on a pre-tax basis, providing immediate tax relief during your highest-earning decade. Mistake #4: Ignoring Tax Diversification (Creating a Retirement Tax Bomb)Many Washington State employees have substantial traditional DCP balances but little in Roth or Taxable accounts. This creates a tax time bomb that explodes in retirement. The Problem: All traditional account withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income. Without tax diversification, you have no flexibility to manage retirement tax brackets. Why This Hurts Your Retirement: · Forces you into higher tax brackets · Limits flexibility for large expenses · Required minimum distributions compound the tax problem³ Long-term Benefit: Tax-free Roth withdrawals in retirement provide flexibility and can significantly reduce your lifetime tax burden. Mistake #5: Failing to Coordinate Investment Strategy with Pension BenefitsThis is the mistake unique to public employees. Most investment advice assumes you're entirely dependent on your portfolio for retirement income, but you have guaranteed pension benefits. Common Coordination Mistakes: · Investing too conservatively because you're ignoring pension value · Not optimizing asset location between account types · Failing to plan strategic withdrawal sequences · Missing the opportunity to take more growth-oriented approaches Strategic Coordination Framework: Asset Location Optimization: · Traditional DCP: Hold less tax-efficient investments · Roth DCP: Hold highest growth potential investments · Taxable accounts: Hold tax-efficient index funds Risk Tolerance Adjustment: Your pension provides predictable income covering basic expenses. This foundation may allow your investment portfolio to focus more on growth and inflation protection. Your 50s Investment Success FrameworkHere's the strategic framework I use with clients to avoid these costly mistakes and maximize wealth building: Foundation Building· Maximize contributions including catch-up amounts³ · Build 5-year buffer for retirement transition · Maintain appropriate equity exposure for long-term growth Tax Strategy Implementation· Plan strategic Roth conversions · Optimize asset location across account types · Plan for tax-efficient retirement withdrawals Risk Management Coordination· Coordinate investment risk with pension security · Maintain rebalancing discipline during volatility · Avoid emotional decision-making Timeline Coordination· Align investment strategy with your specific retirement timeline · Plan for 20-30 year investment horizon, not just to retirement · Build flexibility for various retirement scenarios Your Next Steps: Don't Let These Mistakes Derail Your RetirementIf you're a Washington State employee in your 50s: Immediate Assessment: 1. Review your current contribution levels and maximize catch-up opportunities 2. Evaluate your current allocation for age-appropriate risk levels 3. Assess your tax diversification across account types Strategic Planning: 1. Coordinate your investment approach with your pension benefits¹ 2. Develop a systematic rebalancing strategy to avoid emotional decisions 3. Plan your withdrawal sequence and tax strategy for retirement Your 50s are your final opportunity to make major course corrections before retirement. The five mistakes outlined above can severely damage your retirement security but avoiding them while maximizing your unique advantages can set you up for financial freedom. The key is coordinating your investment strategy with your pension benefits to build a retirement plan that works for your specific situation rather than following generic advice designed for people without guaranteed income. Don't let fear, emotion, or misunderstanding of your advantages cost you the retirement you've worked decades to achieve. Sources: ¹ Washington State Department of Retirement Systems. https://www.drs.wa.gov/ ² Social Security Administration. Life Expectancy Tables. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html ³ Internal Revenue Service. Retirement Plan Contribution Limits. https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-contributions 4 Internal Revenue Service. Issue Snapshot - Section 457(b) plan of governmental and tax-exempt employers - Catch-up contributions. https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/issue-snapshot-section-457b-plan-of-governmental-and-tax-exempt-employers-catch-up-contributions -Seth Deal |
Content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized financial or investment advice. Consult with a qualified financial advisor to discuss your individual circumstances before making any financial decisions.
AuthorsBob Deal is a CPA with over 30 years of experience and been a financial planner for 25 years. Archives
August 2026
Categories |
